Ultra-Wideband Localization for Indoor Robotics

Authors

  • Sanjay Mukesh Kapoor Government College, Karauli, Rajasthan, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2021.0404002

Keywords:

Ultra-Wideband (UWB), Indoor Localization, Time-of-Flight (ToF), Sensor Fusion, Kalman Filter, Mobile Robots, Multipath Mitigation, Anchor Deployment, Centimeter-Level Accuracy

Abstract

Indoor robotics demands highly accurate and robust localization for navigation, mapping, and task execution. Ultra-Wideband (UWB) localization—based on very short radio pulses and time-of-flight measurements— offers centimeter-level accuracy, strong resistance to multipath interference, and minimal interference with other wireless systems, positioning it as a promising solution in cluttered indoor environments Wiley Online LibraryResearchGateWikipedia. This paper synthesizes pre-2020 research on UWB-based localization for indoor robotics, covering fundamental system design, hybrid sensor fusion approaches, and practical deployments. A 2012 UWB impulse-based system demonstrated that, with corrections like antenna modeling and signal threshold adjustments, localization accuracy could be enhanced to as fine as 2.5 cm—versus 9 cm baseline accuracy Wiley Online Library. Fusion methods combining UWB with inertial sensors (IMUs) using steady-state Kalman filters have yielded significant reductions in localization error while preserving computational simplicity arXiv. UWB + IMU fusion through Extended Kalman Filters (EKF) or robust MAP-based estimators also mitigated drift and multipath effects by over 100% compared to standalone UWB methods Cambridge University Press & Assessment. Comparative experiments confirmed UWB’s dominance over Wi-Fi and Bluetooth in mobile robot tracking—tracking errors remained below ~13 cm static and ~30 cm mobile, representing improvements of over 88% relative to BLEbased systems MDPIPubMed. However, UWB systems face limitations: high hardware costs, complexity in anchor deployment, and susceptibility to non-line-of-sight (NLOS) and multipath propagation, requiring careful configuration and, often, sensor fusion MDPIResearchGate. We discuss these findings, outlining advantages, challenges, and future directions for integrating UWB in indoor robotics.

References

1. Zwirello (2012). Impulse-based UWB localization for indoor applications—hardware setup and accuracy improvement (up to 2.5 cm) Wiley Online Library.

2. Savioli et al. (2013). UWB and IMU fusion with steady-state Kalman filter for low-complexity localization arXiv.

3. Kok et al. & Yao et al. (pre-2020). UWB–IMU fusion via MAP and EKF achieving over 100% accuracy improvement Cambridge University Press & Assessment.

4. Comparative experiments (pre-2020). Evaluated UWB vs BLE and Wi-Fi for mobile robot localization—UWB outperformed significantly MDPIPubMed.

5. Performance studies. Untethered UWB configurations and deployment challenges ResearchGate.

6. Reviews (pre-2020). UWB characteristics, advantages, and limitations in indoor IPS.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-01

How to Cite

Ultra-Wideband Localization for Indoor Robotics. (2021). International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 4(4), 5512-5514. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2021.0404002