Empirical Analysis of user-Perceived Latency in Large-Scale Cloud-Integrated Mobile Applications

Authors

  • Nick Veys Independent Researcher, Omaha, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2022.0506022

Keywords:

User-Perceived Latency, Mobile Application Performance, Cloud-Integrated Systems, Perceived Speed Techniques, Skeleton Loading Screens, Progressive Rendering, End-to-End Latency Analysis

Abstract

In large-scale, cloud-integrated mobile applications, minimizing latency is paramount for user satisfaction and retention. However, traditional technical metrics (e.g., Request-Response Time, TTFB) often fail to correlate directly with the User-Perceived Latency (UPL), the subjective experience of speed. This paper proposes a novel framework for UPL analysis by integrating quantitative telemetry (network/CPU time) with qualitative user interaction metrics (e.g., time-to-first-scroll, interaction-to-next-paint, and visual completion). We analyze a multi-region e-commerce platform and find that application-layer rendering and data-hydration delays account for up to $\mathbf{70\%}$ of the observed UPL, significantly more than network or API latency. The empirical findings demonstrate that prioritizing Perceived Speed Techniques (PST)—such as Skeleton Loading Screens and Progressive Rendering—results in a $40\%$ reduction in perceived waiting time compared to traditional loading spinners, despite no change in underlying technical latency. This work establishes a data-driven methodology for prioritizing engineering effort toward visual and interactive completion cues, aligning development focus with actual user experience.

References

1. Miller, R. B. (1968). Response time in man-computer conversational transactions. AFIPS Joint Computer Conference Proceedings, 33(2), 565-573. (Foundational psychological work on latency tolerance).

2. Singh, A., Sharma, R., & Kumar, V. (2022). Linking frontend performance to backend resource consumption: A microservices perspective. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(5), 1800-1815.

3. Kolla, S. (2020). NEO4J GRAPH DATA SCIENCE (GDS) LIBRARY: ADVANCED ANALYTICS ON CONNECTED DATA. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(8), 1077-1086. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET_11_08_106

4. Vogl, M. (2021). The impact of JavaScript execution time on web application performance. Journal of Web Engineering, 20(4), 381-402.

5. Vogels, W. (2008). A decade of Dynamo: Lessons from high-scale distributed systems. ACM Queue, 6(6).

6. Vangavolu, S. V. (2022). IMPLEMENTING MICROSERVICES ARCHITECTURE WITH NODE.JS AND EXPRESS IN MEAN APPLICATIONS. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 13(08), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET_13_08_007

7. Zhao, Q., Liu, Y., & Li, M. (2022). Optimizing the user experience: A survey on adaptive content delivery in mobile and web environments. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(1), 123-145.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-10

How to Cite

Empirical Analysis of user-Perceived Latency in Large-Scale Cloud-Integrated Mobile Applications. (2022). International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 5(6), 8118-8121. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2022.0506022