A Cloud-Native AI Framework for Secure Financial Networks: DevSecOps-Enabled Threat Detection and Multivariate Risk Analytics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2022.0503003Keywords:
Cloud-native security, DevSecOps, financial networks, anomaly detection, multivariate risk analytics, feature store, model governance, graph neural networks, real-time detection, secure CI/CDAbstract
The financial sector faces an evolving threat landscape driven by increasing digitalization, sophisticated attackers, and the broad adoption of cloud-native architectures. This paper proposes a comprehensive Cloud‑Native AI Framework designed specifically for secure financial networks that combines DevSecOps practices, continual threat detection using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), and multivariate risk analytics to provide proactive, adaptive defense and compliance capabilities. The framework emphasizes microservices-based architecture, containerization, immutable infrastructure, and policy-as-code to deliver secure, resilient, and auditable deployment pipelines. At its core, an ensemble of real-time anomaly detectors—ranging from lightweight statistical models for latency-sensitive streams to deep graph neural networks for relationship and fraud detection—operates alongside a feature-store-backed risk analytics engine that ingests telemetry, transaction flows, identity signals, and third-party threat intelligence.
The DevSecOps pipeline integrates automated security testing, vulnerability scanning, secrets management, and policy enforcement into CI/CD stages, ensuring that security is shifted left and continuously verified. Risk scoring is produced by multivariate models that combine behavioral, network, financial, and contextual features to produce interpretable risk vectors for downstream decision systems (e.g., block/allow decisions, transaction throttling, investigator alerts). The framework includes feedback loops: analyst-labeled incidents and outcomes feed back into model retraining and policy refinement, enabling continuous improvement and adaptation to adversary evolution.
We evaluate the framework via simulated datasets and a case study deployment in a mid-size banking environment, demonstrating improvements in detection F1-scores, mean time-to-detection (MTTD), and reduction in false positives compared to baseline signature-based and single-model approaches. Additionally, implementation of DevSecOps principles reduced deployment-related misconfigurations and accelerated secure releases without sacrificing compliance. The paper concludes with design recommendations, limitations, and future directions, such as integrating federated learning for cross-institution privacy-preserving collaboration and enhanced model governance for regulatory compliance.
References
1. Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2015). Graph-based anomaly detection and description: A survey. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 29(3), 626–688.
2. Sudarsan, V., & Sugumar, R. (2019). Building a distributed K‐Means model for Weka using remote method invocation (RMI) feature of Java. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 31(14), e5313.
3. Mani, K., Pichaimani, T., & Siripuram, N. K. (2021). RiskPredict360: Leveraging Explainable AI for Comprehensive Risk Management in Insurance and Investment Banking. Newark Journal of Human-Centric AI and Robotics Interaction, 1, 34-70.
4. Kapadia, V., Jensen, J., McBride, G., Sundaramoothy, J., Deshmukh, R., Sacheti, P., & Althati, C. (2015). U.S. Patent No. 8,965,820. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
5. M. A. Alim, M. R. Rahman, M. H. Arif, and M. S. Hossen, “Enhancing fraud detection and security in banking and e-commerce with AI-powered identity verification systems,” 2020.
6. Hardial Singh, “ENHANCING CLOUD SECURITY POSTURE WITH AI-DRIVEN THREAT DETECTION AND RESPONSE MECHANISMS”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (IJCESR), VOLUME-6, ISSUE-2, 2019.
7. Kumbum, P. K., Adari, V. K., Chunduru, V. K., Gonepally, S., & Amuda, K. K. (2020). Artificial intelligence using TOPSIS method. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 3(6), 4305-4311.
8. Gonepally, S., Amuda, K. K., Kumbum, P. K., Adari, V. K., & Chunduru, V. K. (2021). The evolution of software maintenance. Journal of Computer Science Applications and Information Technology, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15226/2474-9257/6/1/00150.
9. Anand, L., & Neelanarayanan, V. (2019). Feature Selection for Liver Disease using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(3), 6434-6439.
10. Girdhar, P., Virmani, D., & Saravana Kumar, S. (2019). A hybrid fuzzy framework for face detection and recognition using behavioral traits. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 22(2), 271-287.
11. Hu, W., & Tan, Y. (2019). Generating adversarial malware examples for black-box attacks based on API call sequences. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference.
12. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
13. Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Sage Publications.
14. Laptev, N., Amizadeh, S., & Flint, I. (2015). Generic and scalable framework for automated time-series anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
15. Sudha, N., Kumar, S. S., Rengarajan, A., & Rao, K. B. (2021). Scrum Based Scaling Using Agile Method to Test Software Projects Using Artificial Neural Networks for Block Chain. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(4), 3711-3727.
16. Jayaraman, S., Rajendran, S., & P, S. P. (2019). Fuzzy c-means clustering and elliptic curve cryptography using privacy preserving in cloud. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, 15(3), 273-287.
17. Kotapati, V. B. R., Pachyappan, R., & Mani, K. (2021). Optimizing Serverless Deployment Pipelines with Azure DevOps and GitHub: A Model-Driven Approach. Newark Journal of Human-Centric AI and Robotics Interaction, 1, 71-107.
18. Chatterjee, P. (2019). Enterprise Data Lakes for Credit Risk Analytics: An Intelligent Framework for Financial Institutions. Asian Journal of Computer Science Engineering, 4(3), 1-12. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pushpalika-Chatterjee/publication/397496748_Enterprise_Data_Lakes_for_Credit_Risk_Analytics_An_Intelligent_Framework_for_Financial_Institutions/links/69133ebec900be105cc0ce55/Enterprise-Data-Lakes-for-Credit-Risk-Analytics-An-Intelligent-Framework-for-Financial-Institutions.pdf
19. Ravipudi, S., Thangavelu, K., & Ramalingam, S. (2021). Automating Enterprise Security: Integrating DevSecOps into CI/CD Pipelines. American Journal of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Innovations, 1, 31-68.
20. Anuj Arora, “Transforming Cybersecurity Threat Detection and Prevention Systems using Artificial Intelligence”, International Journal of Management, Technology And Engineering, Volume XI, Issue XI, NOVEMBER 2021.
21. Kumar, R., Al-Turjman, F., Anand, L., Kumar, A., Magesh, S., Vengatesan, K., ... & Rajesh, M. (2021). Genomic sequence analysis of lung infections using artificial intelligence technique. Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, 13(2), 192-200.
22. Varshney, K. R., & Alemzadeh, H. (2017). On the safety of machine learning: Cyber-physical systems, decision sciences, and accountability. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 32(6), 43–52.





